Category Archives: Federal Rights Litigation

Amicus Brief: Compucredit Corp. v. Wanda Greenwood (Supreme Court)

A case pending at the Supreme Court regarding the right to arbitrate could potentially address whether a statutory notice requirement conveys rights.  NSCLC joined with AARP to file a Supreme Court amicus brief addressing this important issue.

Posted in Federal Rights Litigation | Comments Off on Amicus Brief: Compucredit Corp. v. Wanda Greenwood (Supreme Court)

Amicus Brief: Court Applies Improper Legal Standards

In an amicus brief, NSCLC argues that a lower court applied the improper legal standard in treating the CMS letter as if it should be granted the same level of deference as a published regulation. Read the Amicus Brief.

Posted in Federal Rights Litigation | Comments Off on Amicus Brief: Court Applies Improper Legal Standards

AARP/NSCLC File Third Party Beneficiary Amicus Brief

AARP and NSCLC joined forces to file an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of third-party beneficiary contract claims in Astra v. Santa Clara. Read the Amicus Brief (Dec. 20, 2010)

Posted in Federal Rights Litigation | Comments Off on AARP/NSCLC File Third Party Beneficiary Amicus Brief

Amicus Brief: Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Reinhard

NSCLC was lead author in an amicus brief that argued that the opinion of an appellate court threatens the supremacy of federal law.  The case appeals the Fourth Circuit’s decision in a case involving a state agency that sought to … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Rights Litigation | Comments Off on Amicus Brief: Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Reinhard

Amicus Brief: Immel v. Lumpkin

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The district court’s holding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars federal court review of the decision of a state administrative agency was clearly in error.  The decision below conflicts with holdings of the Supreme Court, this Court, and … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Rights Litigation | Comments Off on Amicus Brief: Immel v. Lumpkin

Amicus Brief: Uhm et al v. Humana Inc.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT This Court should reverse the district court’s order dismissing Plaintiffs-Appellants’ action on the grounds that the claims were preempted. The Court must apply the presumption against preemption, recognizing the historic presence of state law in protecting the … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Rights Litigation | Comments Off on Amicus Brief: Uhm et al v. Humana Inc.

Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION INTRODUCTION This petition should be denied. The Ninth Circuit below, in an interlocutory order, judgment and opinion filed July 11, 2008 (to which the September 17, 2008 Opinion, reprinted by petitioner at Pet. App. 1a-36a, simply “more fully sets forth the … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Rights Litigation | Comments Off on Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center

Amicus Brief: Independent Living Center v. Shewry

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT This Court should affirm the district court’s order granting in part, Petitioners-Appellees’ (Petitioners) motion for preliminary injunction. The California Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, has the lowest Medicaid spending per enrollee in the nation and one of the lowest … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Rights Litigation | Comments Off on Amicus Brief: Independent Living Center v. Shewry